To the extent possible under law, the editors have waived all copyright
and related or neighboring rights to this work.
In addition, as of 13 March 2024,
the editors have made this specification available under the Open Web Foundation Agreement Version 1.0,
which is available at http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0.
Parts of this work may be from another specification document. If so, those parts are instead covered by the license of that specification document.
Abstract
do we want a getUsedStyleMap too? Or should it be getResolvedStyleMap? [Issue #157]
Need to add a section describing unions of types. [Issue #163]
Need to add a section describing shorthands. [Issue #161]
Spec up URIValue, ShapeValue, StringValue, CounterValue, TimeValue, PercentageValue, FrequencyValue, VoiceValue, CustomIdentValue, TransitionTimingFunctionValue. What is attr(<identifier>) in other specs? [Issue #158]
Do we want to make a generic PairValue and QuadValue, or have more specific classes for background-size, border-image-repeat, border-radius-*, border-image-outset, border-image-width? [Issue #155]
Do we want a font value class? How about a FontWeightValue (for 100, 200 etc) class? [Issue #142]
Add more CSS3 properties. This table currently only contains CSS2.1 properties and CSS3 properties alphabetically to border-radius. [Issue #144]
Need an array-buffer custom property type. [Issue #136]
consider using properties in addition to get/set. [Issue #310]
Conformance
Document conventions
Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of
descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”,
“MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”,
“RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase
letters in this specification.
All of the text of this specification is normative except sections
explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]
Examples in this specification are introduced with the words “for example”
or are set apart from the normative text with class="example",
like this:
This is an example of an informative example.
Informative notes begin with the word “Note” and are set apart from the
normative text with class="note", like this:
Note, this is an informative note.
Advisements are normative sections styled to evoke special attention and are
set apart from other normative text with <strong class="advisement">, like
this: UAs MUST provide an accessible alternative.
Conformance classes
Conformance to this specification
is defined for three conformance classes:
A style sheet is conformant to this specification
if all of its statements that use syntax defined in this module are valid
according to the generic CSS grammar and the individual grammars of each
feature defined in this module.
A renderer is conformant to this specification
if, in addition to interpreting the style sheet as defined by the
appropriate specifications, it supports all the features defined
by this specification by parsing them correctly
and rendering the document accordingly. However, the inability of a
UA to correctly render a document due to limitations of the device
does not make the UA non-conformant. (For example, a UA is not
required to render color on a monochrome monitor.)
An authoring tool is conformant to this specification
if it writes style sheets that are syntactically correct according to the
generic CSS grammar and the individual grammars of each feature in
this module, and meet all other conformance requirements of style sheets
as described in this module.
Partial implementations
So that authors can exploit the forward-compatible parsing rules to
assign fallback values, CSS renderers must treat as invalid (and ignore
as appropriate) any at-rules, properties, property values, keywords,
and other syntactic constructs for which they have no usable level of
support. In particular, user agents must not selectively
ignore unsupported component values and honor supported values in a single
multi-value property declaration: if any value is considered invalid
(as unsupported values must be), CSS requires that the entire declaration
be ignored.
Implementations of Unstable and Proprietary Features
Once a specification reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage,
non-experimental implementations are possible, and implementors should
release an unprefixed implementation of any CR-level feature they
can demonstrate to be correctly implemented according to spec.
To establish and maintain the interoperability of CSS across
implementations, the CSS Working Group requests that non-experimental
CSS renderers submit an implementation report (and, if necessary, the
testcases used for that implementation report) to the W3C before
releasing an unprefixed implementation of any CSS features. Testcases
submitted to W3C are subject to review and correction by the CSS
Working Group.
do we want a getUsedStyleMap too? Or should it be getResolvedStyleMap? [Issue #157]↵
Need to add a section describing unions of types. [Issue #163]↵
Need to add a section describing shorthands. [Issue #161]↵
Spec up URIValue, ShapeValue, StringValue, CounterValue, TimeValue, PercentageValue, FrequencyValue, VoiceValue, CustomIdentValue, TransitionTimingFunctionValue. What is attr(<identifier>) in other specs? [Issue #158]↵
Do we want to make a generic PairValue and QuadValue, or have more specific classes for background-size, border-image-repeat, border-radius-*, border-image-outset, border-image-width? [Issue #155]↵
